Skip to content
EuroClio – Inspiring History and Citizenship Educators Logo
  • Who we are
    • Association
      • Our History
      • Mission and vision
      • General Assembly
      • Governance and Policy Documents
      • Annual reports
    • People
      • Board
      • Honorary Board
      • Advisors
      • Ambassadors
      • Historiana Teams
      • Staff
      • Young Professionals
    • Manifesto
    • Institute for Historical Justice and Reconciliation
  • What we do
    • Projects
      • Online Teaching in the Visegrad Region
      • Contested Histories
      • In Europe Schools
      • Learning History that is not yet History II
      • Sharing European Histories
      • Innovation Station
      • European Data Space for Cultural Heritage
    • Professional Development
      • Annual Conferences
      • Webinars
      • Online Course for Online Teaching
      • EuroClio Young Professional Programme
    • Consultancies
      • Council of Europe
    • Latest annual report
  • Events
    • Annual Conferences
    • Workshop
    • Online Seminars
  • News
    • EuroClio & Members
    • Opportunities
    • Articles
    • Reviews
  • Resources
    • Teaching practice
    • Educational material
    • Research
    • Recommendations
    • Historiana
    • Podcast
    • Contested Histories.org
  • Join us
  • Members
    • Become a member
    • Full Membership
    • Associated Membership
    • Individual Membership
  • Donate

Ukraine, a complex and difficult history

Ukraine, a complex and difficult history

In my early days with EuroClio, I travelled widely in the countries of the former Soviet Union. One of my recurring questions was how many Slavic variants or Slavic dialects were spoken in the countries of the Soviet Union. To my surprise the standard answer was always negative, everywhere people seem to have spoken standard Belarusian, Russian or Ukrainian. That astonished me coming from a small country with a large variation in Dutch/Germanic dialects: two A-languages, Dutch and Frisian, one B language., Limburgian, and within all three an enormous variation in dialects and accents. 

My question popped up again while reading the Gates of Europe, a History of Ukraine written in 2015 by Serhii Plokhy (Mykhailo Hrushevsky Professor of Ukrainian history at Harvard University). I found it highly appropriate background reading to understand today’s horrible war in Ukraine. The book gives a narrative of the wide spectrum of complex events and influences that have shaped current day Ukraine and its relations with its neighbours. Plokhy begins his story more than two thousand years ago, with the origins of the Slavs, and takes us via the Vikings, the Byzantine Empire, the Mongols, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Muscovy, The Cossacks, the Russian and Austrian-Habsburg Empires, the post-World War chaos, the Soviet Union, Nazi-Germany and finally to independent Ukraine. He is able to write a coherent narrative addressing the many players, tendencies and forces which together created over 2000 years of  history.

However, this is a history which goes far beyond the current borders of Ukraine; it is a history of Central/Eastern Europe that was the playing field for many actors who were interested in the rich spoils of this region, and thought they could claim its ownership. This battle for ownership is significant as it determines up till today the clash regarding the history of Ukraine. In the current war we all have seen how Putin misused the past many times to justify his actions and to manipulate the Russian population into believing that he is fighting for the right outcome. However, other politicians and historians in the region also show a tendency with the same motives to claim absolute truth for their ‘national’ narratives. Ukrainian scholar Georgiy Kasianov gives in Memory Crash, The Politics of History in and around Ukraine 1980s–2010s, written in 2018, a saddening account of how history was used by Ukrainian presidents, national and local politicians and authorities, and historians to argue for their righteous interpretation of Ukraine’s past. He demonstrates this with a manifold of examples of how, instead of feeling together responsible to create a narrative that accepts the substantial diversity of Ukraine’s past as well as present, they were and are all fighting against each other about the right interpretation of the history of Ukraine. They develop politically motivated (regional) ethno-centric narratives using laws, institutions, publications, monuments, and even stamps and coins. Of course, also school history education is an unresolved battleground for claiming the historical Ukrainian truth. 

I read the Gates of Europe with the background memory of the many examples given by Georgiy Kasianov in his publication. It struck me that a very close reading of this publication revealed some of the more problematic elements noticed by Kasianov. Plokhy does not shy away from bold statements. In his narration, Ukrainians seem to have a unified identity already in the Cossack times. Ukrainians are peasants with no nobility, New Russia is in 1790 composed of mainly ethnic Ukrainians, the workers in the 19th century industry in the East are migrated ethnic Russians. The pogroms in Kiev in 1905 can be blamed on gangs of migrant workers, Orthodox zealots or outrights criminals. In this case, as in many others, when the plight of the Ukrainian Jews is mentioned, the ethnicity of the perpetrators is blurred and all these statements are not supported by any evidence.

The initial chapters and the final chapters make for an excellent read but the period between 1500 and independence stem too much from a Ukrainian ethno-centric point of view. The Slavic ethnic diversity pictured is seen through current day border divisions of Poles, Russians, Belarusians and Ukrainians but hardly takes into account the many regional Slavic differentiations in the vast area this publication is addressing. It does in a way acknowledge the old tale that there was no big regional variation in dialects and tones. The lack of clear referencing is another weakness of the publication as well as the absence of reference to fundamental source research. However, there is a substantial list of literature of background and further reading.

I noticed in June that Plokhy’s book was massively available in bookshops in the United Kingdom. A good thing as many in Europe and beyond are quite ignorant of the history of Ukraine. A country that, as EuroClio Ambassador Iryna Kostyuk rightly remarked some months ago, is for many not more than a blank spot on the geographical map. I recommend reading it together with Georgiy Kasianov’s Memory Crash, to be aware how you can be manipulated into another national interpretation of the past. Writing complex and inclusive national narratives is always difficult, and it seems almost impossible if it is about Ukraine, a vast territory and country with an extremely multifaceted and often tragic past. Plokhy did his best but was not fully able to avoid the ethno-centric pitfall. But with that element in mind, the publication is a good English language asset for learning to understand Ukraine’s past and present. 

Reviewed and written by Joke van der Leeuw-Roord, EuroClio Founder and Special Adviser

Serhii Plokhy, the Gates of Europe, a History of Ukraine (2015). Basic Books; Reprint edition (May 30, 2017). 448 pages. Available for US$19.99 at basicbooks.com

Georgiy Kasianov, Memory Crash, The Politics of History in and around Ukraine 1980s–2010s (2018). Central European University Press (January 28, 2022), 422 pages. Available for US$82 on amazon.com

Joke Van der Leeuw-Roord2022-09-05T12:34:13+02:00September 5, 2022|Categories: Featured, Reviews|Tags: Ukraine|

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

About the Author: Joke Van der Leeuw-Roord

Related Posts

Seminar on historical thinking concepts in Sri Lanka

Seminar on historical thinking concepts in Sri Lanka

February 1, 2023
Help us pilot teaching practices

Help us pilot teaching practices

January 20, 2023
Call for Experts for the project “Football Makes History II”

Call for Experts for the project “Football Makes History II”

January 20, 2023
Call for EuroClio Board Members Candidates

Call for EuroClio Board Members Candidates

January 20, 2023
Call for papers  ‘The Anthropocene and History Education’

Call for papers ‘The Anthropocene and History Education’

January 16, 2023
ISHD Conference & Call for papers on Heritage in History Education

ISHD Conference & Call for papers on Heritage in History Education

January 16, 2023
Contested Histories OnSite: Virtual Tours & Lectures

Contested Histories OnSite: Virtual Tours & Lectures

December 22, 2022
Call for ideas and projects for the European Innovation Days in History Education

Call for ideas and projects for the European Innovation Days in History Education

December 12, 2022
“Who Were the Victims of the National Socialists?” Interview with Matej Beláček (Team Slovakia)

“Who Were the Victims of the National Socialists?” Interview with Matej Beláček (Team Slovakia)

December 2, 2022
Report from The Idea of Democracy Conference in Kolkata, August 2022

Report from The Idea of Democracy Conference in Kolkata, August 2022

December 1, 2022
“Who Were the Victims of the National Socialists?” Interview with Tatjana Jurić (Team Bosnia and Herzegovina)

“Who Were the Victims of the National Socialists?” Interview with Tatjana Jurić (Team Bosnia and Herzegovina)

November 25, 2022
Ukrainian history textbooks for refugee students

Ukrainian history textbooks for refugee students

November 18, 2022

Other news

  • Seminar on historical thinking concepts in Sri Lanka February 1, 2023
  • Historical Thinking, Culture, and Education: Call for Papers January 30, 2023
  • 6th Public History Summer School, University of Wrocław (12-16 June 2023) January 26, 2023
  • Conference – “The Politics of Memory as a Weapon: Perspectives on Russia’s War against Ukraine” (8-10 February 2023) January 23, 2023
  • Help us pilot teaching practices January 20, 2023
  • Call for Experts for the project “Football Makes History II” January 20, 2023

Project: 101051062 — FPA2021 .

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or CERV. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

 

Contact us!

Riouwstraat 139 2585 HP, The Hague The Netherlands +31 70 3817836 secretariat@euroclio.eu

Privacy & GDPR Policy

Child Protection Policy

REGISTER FOR OUR NEWS

Page load link
Go to Top